standing Letters

The Town of Charlestown authorized expenditure of $74,000 to survey its citizens for their priorities on spending the budget surplus. Frank Glista fears a random sampling will deny a majority of the public a voice, and suggests a random sampling is intended to hoodwink the public (Letters to the editor, Tuesday, Oct. 15).

In fact, a properly designed random sampling is a mathematically defensible and cost-effective method for arriving at a general opinion. It even allows an estimate of the margin of error. There is nothing to fear from a properly designed random sampling to arrive at global opinion.

George Tremblay

Charlestown

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.